Senate Meetings:

Agendas and Minutes

2016-17 Faculty Senate Meetings:

October 12, 2016

November 9, 2016
December 14, 2016
February 8, 2017
March 8, 2017
April 12, 2017
May 10, 2017
June 14, 2017

University Union, 332
2:00pm - 4:00pm

Archives

Committee on Evaluation of University Administrators

Chair:  Michael Spector

Membership: 12 members, 8 tenured faculty (one from each group) or librarians (with 5 year contracts) and 4 university administrators appointed by the Provost & VP for Academic Affairs. The committee shall elect a chair.

Terms: 3 years term,  with terms of faculty members staggered so that no more than 3 expire in any given year.

* Indicates Second Term

  • Group I: Marie-Christine Koop (FREN) - Term End 2017
  • Group II: @Michael Spector (LTEC) - Term Ends 2017
  • Group III: Jose Perez (PHYS) - Term Ends 2017
  • Group IV: VACANT (Sahliyeh)
  • Group V: Elliot Dubin (HMGT) - Term Ends 2019
  • Group VI: Bill Camp (TEA) - Term Ends 2017
  • Group VII: VACANT (Moore)
  • Group VIII: Barbara Cox (DANC) - Term Ends 2018

Provost Appointees:

  • Christy Crutsinger, Vice Provost for Academic Affairs
  • VACANT
  • VACANT
  • VACANT

Committee on the Evaluation of Administrators Charges:

  • Conduct the annual survey in March. Work closely with the Executive Committee on the questions and format.
  • In conjunction with Faculty Senate Executive Committee and the Charter and Bylaws Committee, determine which categories of faculty (such as lecturers) will be eligible to participate in the survey.
  • Using the list of positions to be evaluated, provided by the Senate Executive Committee, create new surveys. Consult with the Executive Committee on best practices for implementing the new surveys.
  • Ensure that results from the previous year’s surveys are available.
  • Evaluate and monitor how the results are utilized.
  • Recommend how these results can best be used by the administration to improve the quality of administrative activity. 
  • In the fall semester, discuss lessons learned during the previous year’s administrator evaluations. In addition, analyze the results of the feedback survey carried out after last year’s evaluations, and make recommendations for changes as necessary. 
  • After the results of the survey are analyzed and utilized in administrator reviews, examine questions on all survey forms to evaluate their usefulness and propose new items or changes when appropriate. Invite the President, Provost, and Deans to comment on relevant surveys. 
  • At least once per semester report to the Committee on Faculty Participation in Governance regarding any issues of concern the Committee on the Evaluation of Administrators might have with respect to implementation of its recommendations.
  • In conjunction with the Executive Committee, consider the possibility of having the Deans reviewed by the Chairs separately from the rest of the evaluations as well as the Provost reviewed by the Deans separately. 

Committee on Evaluation of University Administrators Annual Report 2014-2015